Stylized remote workspace icon

Remote Labor Index:
Measuring AI Automation of Remote Work

CAIS LogoScale AI Logo

Mantas Mazeika∗1, Alice Gatti∗1, Cristina Menghini∗†, Udari Madhushani Sehwag∗2, Shivam Singhal∗†, Yury Orlovskiy∗1

Steven Basart1, Manasi Sharma2, Denis Peskoff2, Elaine Lau2, Jaehyuk Lim1, Lachlan Carroll1, Alice Blair1, Vinaya Sivakumar1, Sumana Basu2, Brad Kenstler2, Yuntao Ma†, Julian Michael†, Xiaoke Li1, Oliver Ingebretsen1, Aditya Mehta1, Jean Mottola1, John Teichmann‡, Kevin Yu‡, Zaina Shaik‡, Adam Khoja1, Richard Ren1, Jason Hausenloy1, Long Phan1, Ye Htet2, Ankit Aich2, Tahseen Rabbani2, Vivswan Shah†, Andriy Novykov1, Felix Binder†

Kirill Chugunov2, Luis Ramirez2, Matias Geralnik2, Hernan Mesura2, Dean Lee†, Ed-Yeremai Hernandez Cardona2, Annette Diamond†

Summer Yue∗∗†, Alexandr Wang∗∗†, Bing Liu∗∗2, Ernesto Hernandez∗∗2, Dan Hendrycks∗∗1

1Center for AI Safety

2Scale AI

∗ Equal contribution   ∗∗ Senior authors   † Work done while at Scale AI   ‡ Work done while at CAIS

Introduction

The potential for AIs to automate human labor is a topic of significant interest and concern. While AIs have made rapid progress on research-oriented benchmarks of knowledge and reasoning, it remains unclear how these gains translate into real economic value and actual automation.

To address this gap, we introduce the Remote Labor Index (RLI), a broadly multi-sector benchmark comprising real-world, economically valuable remote-work projects designed to evaluate end-to-end agent performance in practical settings. Across evaluated frontier AI agent frameworks, performance sits near the floor on RLI projects.

These results help ground discussions of AI automation in empirical evidence, setting a common basis for tracking progress and enabling stakeholders to proactively navigate AI-driven labor automation.

Example Projects from RLI

Remote Labor Index overview diagram

Remote Labor Index Overview

RLI represents a broad range of projects from across the remote labor economy, including game development, product design, architecture, data analysis, and video animation. These projects span a broad range of difficulty, with costs reaching over $10,000 and completion times exceeding 100 hours. All project costs and completion times come directly from human professionals who completed the work. In total, the projects in RLI represent over 6,000 hours of real work valued at over $140,000.

Distribution of RLI project costs and completion times
RLI is close to the complexity and costs of real freelance labor. All project costs and completion times come directly from human professionals who completed the projects.

Evaluation Results

While AI systems have saturated many existing benchmarks, we find that state-of-the-art AI agents perform near the floor on RLI. The best-performing model still achieves a very low automation rate. This demonstrates that contemporary AI systems fail to complete the vast majority of projects at a quality level that would be accepted as commissioned work.

While absolute automation rates are low, our analysis shows that models are steadily improving and that progress on these complex tasks is measurable. This provides a common basis for tracking the trajectory of AI automation, enabling stakeholders to proactively navigate its impacts.

ModelAutomation Rate (%)
Loading leaderboard results...

Selected models from the CAIS AI Dashboard. For the latest results, visit dashboard.safe.ai.

Citation

Copied!
@misc{mazeika2025remote,
      title = {Remote Labor Index: Measuring AI Automation of Remote Work},
      author = {Mantas Mazeika and Alice Gatti and Cristina Menghini and Udari Madhushani Sehwag and Shivam Singhal and Yury Orlovskiy and Steven Basart and Manasi Sharma and Denis Peskoff and Elaine Lau and Jaehyuk Lim and Lachlan Carroll and Alice Blair and Vinaya Sivakumar and Sumana Basu and Brad Kenstler and Yuntao Ma and Julian Michael and Xiaoke Li and Oliver Ingebretsen and Aditya Mehta and Jean Mottola and John Teichmann and Kevin Yu and Zaina Shaik and Adam Khoja and Richard Ren and Jason Hausenloy and Long Phan and Ye Htet and Ankit Aich and Tahseen Rabbani and Vivswan Shah and Andriy Novykov and Felix Binder and Kirill Chugunov and Luis Ramirez and Matias Geralnik and Hernán Mesura and Dean Lee and Ed-Yeremai Hernandez Cardona and Annette Diamond and Summer Yue and Alexandr Wang and Bing Liu and Ernesto Hernandez and Dan Hendrycks},
      year            = {2025},
      eprint          = {2510.26787},
      archivePrefix   = {arXiv},
      primaryClass    = {cs.LG},
      url             = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26787}
}